School Accountability Report Card

SARC
Select language

California Department of Education
School Accountability Report Card

Reported Using Data from the 2014-15 School Year
Published During 2015-16

Elizabeth Learning Center

Every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC), by February 1 of each year. The SARC contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educational agencies (LEAs) are required to prepare a Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, with specific activities to address state and local priorities. Additionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent with data reported in the SARC.

DataQuest is an online data tool located on the CDE DataQuest Web page at http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/ that contains additional information about this school and comparisons of the school to the district, the county, and the state. Specifically, DataQuest is a dynamic system that provides reports for accountability (e.g., test data, enrollment, high school graduates, dropouts, course enrollments, staffing, and data regarding English learners.

Internet access is available at public libraries and other locations that are publicly accessible (e.g., the California State Library). Access to the Internet at libraries and public locations is generally provided on a first-come, first-served basis. Other use restrictions may include the hours of operation, the length of time that a workstation may be used (depending on availability), the types of software programs available on a workstation, and the ability to print documents.


About This School

District Contact Information
District Name Los Angeles Unified School District
Phone Number 213-241-1000
Superintendent Michelle King
E-mail Address michelle.king@lausd.net
Web Site achieve.lausd.net
Top of Page

School Contact Information - Most Recent Year
School Name Elizabeth Learning Center
Elizabeth Learning Center (Elizabeth LC)
Street 4811 ELIZABETH ST
City, State, Zip CUDAHY, CA 90201
Phone Number 323-271-3600
Principal LENON, DAMIAN D
E-mail Address dlenon@lausd.net
Web Site www.elizabethlc.org
County-District-School (CDS) Code 19 64733 6016885
Top of Page

School Description and Mission Statement

All youth achieving is the overall mission of Los Angeles Unified School District. The District's vision is that every LAUSD student will complete high school college-prepared and career-ready. To achieve our mission and vision, all schools in the District are committed to meeting the five goals listed below:

  1. 100% Graduation
  2. Academic Proficiency for All Students
  3. 100% Attendance
  4. Student, Parent, and Community Engagement
  5. School Safety

This School Accountability Report Card shows how well our school and students are meeting the District's goals.


Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2014-15)
Grade Level Number of Students
Kindergarten 117
Grade 1 80
Grade 2 123
Grade 3 119
Grade 4 100
Grade 5 115
Grade 6 140
Grade 7 146
Grade 8 135
Ungraded Elementary 0
Grade 9 232
Grade 10 181
Grade 11 192
Grade 12 124
Ungraded Secondary 0
Total Enrollment 1,804
Top of Page

Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2014-15)
Group Percent of Total Enrollment
Black or African American 0.3
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.3
Asian 0.1
Filipino 0.2
Hispanic or Latino 98.0
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0.0
White 0.8
Two or More Races 0.1
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 94.6
English Learners 28.9
Students with Disabilities 10.4
Foster Youth 1.3
Top of Page

A.  Conditions of Learning

State Priority: Basic

The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Basic State Priority (Priority 1):


Teacher Credentials
Teachers School 2013-14 School 2014-15 School 2015-16 District 2015-16
Teachers With Full Credential 84 78 76 24,549
Teachers Without Full Credential 0 1 1 450
Teachers Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence (with full credential) 9 28 31 4,246
Top of Page

Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions
Indicator 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners 4 5 5
Misassignments of Teachers of Physical Education 0 0 0
Total Teacher Misassignments* 33 91 96
Vacant Teacher Positions 0 0 0

Note: "Misassignments" refers to the number of positions filled by teachers who lack legal authorization to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc.
* Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners.

Top of Page

Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers
(School Year 2014-15)
Location of Classes Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects
Taught by
Highly Qualified Teachers
Not Taught by
Highly Qualified Teachers
This School 97.46 2.54
All Schools in District 87.65 12.35
High-Poverty Schools in District 93.24 6.76
Low-Poverty Schools in District 45.04 54.96

Note: High-poverty schools are defined as those schools with student eligibility of approximately 40 percent or more in the free and reduced price meals program. Low-poverty schools are those with student eligibility of approximately 39 percent or less in the free and reduced price meals program.

Top of Page

Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials
- Most Recent Year

(Month and year in which data were collected: October 2015)
Subject Textbooks and Instructional
Materials / Year of Adoption
From Most Recent Adoption? Percent Students Lacking
Own Assigned Copy
Reading / Language Arts 2002-2004, 2011 Yes 0%
Mathematics 2014-2015 Yes 0%
Science 2007 Yes 0%
History-Social Science 2006 Yes 0%
Foreign Language 2004 Yes 0%
Health 2005 Yes 0%
Visual and Performing Arts 2008 Yes 0%
Science Laboratory Equipment (Grades 9-12) N/A N/A 0%*

Note: Assembly Bill X4 2 (Chapter 2, Statutes of 2009-10 Fourth Extraordinary Session) signed on July 28, 2009, suspended the process and procedures for adopting instructional materials, including framework revisions, until the 2013-14 school year. Senate Bill (Chapter 7 of the Statutes of 2011) extended that suspension until the 2015-16 school year.
Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data.
* Science Lab equipment sufficiency is per school, not per pupil.

Top of Page

School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements - Most Recent Year

The District takes great efforts to ensure that all schools are clean, safe, and functional within the available resources. The District has established cleaning standards for all school facilities in assigning and inspecting custodial work. Food service and restroom facilities are given highest priority on a daily basis to ensure the health and safety of students and staff. Other cleaning functions may be scheduled on a less than daily frequency due to the limitation of available custodial resources. Determination of repair status is based on the most recent SARC Inspection. Additional information about the condition of the school facilities may be obtained from the school.

School Facility Good Repair Status - Most Recent Year

(Month and year in which data were collected: August 2015)
System Inspected Repair Status Repair Needed and Action Taken or Planned
Gas Leaks GOOD
Mechanical / HVAC GOOD
Sewer GOOD
Interior Surfaces GOOD
Overall Cleanliness GOOD
Pest / Vermin Infestation GOOD
Electrical (Interior and Exterior) GOOD
Restrooms GOOD
Sinks / Drinking Fountains (Inside and Outside) GOOD
Fire Safety GOOD
Hazardous Materials (Interior and Exterior) GOOD
Structural Damage GOOD
Roofs GOOD
Playground / School Grounds GOOD
Windows / Doors / Gates / Fences GOOD
Overall Rating EXEMPLARY

Note: The cited maintenance deficiencies in the category have not been repaired or mitigated to date, but have been reported via Service Call or identified as a deferred maintenance or bond project and will be completed as soon as funding becomes available.

Top of Page

B. Pupil Outcomes

State Priority: Pupil Achievement

The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Pupil Achievement State Priority (Priority 4):


California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Results
for All Students (School Year 2014-15)
Subject Percent of Students Meeting or Exceeding the State Standards
School District State
English Language Arts / Literacy (Grades 3-8 and 11) 23 33 44
Mathematics (Grades 3-8 and 11) 13 25 33

Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.

Top of Page

CAASPP Assessment Results - English Language Arts (ELA)
Disaggregated by Student Groups, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven
(School Year 2014-15)

ELA - Grade 3
Student Groups Total
Enrollment
Number
Tested
Percent
Tested
Percent
Achievement
Level 1*
Percent
Achievement
Level 2*
Percent
Achievement
Level 3*
Percent
Achievement
Level 4*
All Students 115 114 99.1 54 25 15 4
Male 115 49 42.6 57 22 16 2
Female 115 65 56.5 52 28 14 5
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native 115 1 0.9 -- -- -- --
Asian 115 1 0.9 -- -- -- --
Filipino
Hispanic or Latino 115 111 96.5 55 26 14 4
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
White
Two or More Races
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 115 109 94.8 56 26 15 3
English Learners 115 40 34.8 78 20 3 0
Students with Disabilities 115 9 7.8 -- -- -- --
Students Receiving Migrant Education Services 115 1 0.9 -- -- -- --
Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Note: Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.
Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores.
* Level 1 = Standard not met
   Level 2 = Standard nearly met
   Level 3 = Standard met
   Level 4 = Standard exceeded

Top of Page

CAASPP Assessment Results - English Language Arts (ELA)
Disaggregated by Student Groups, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven
(School Year 2014-15)

ELA - Grade 4
Student Groups Total
Enrollment
Number
Tested
Percent
Tested
Percent
Achievement
Level 1*
Percent
Achievement
Level 2*
Percent
Achievement
Level 3*
Percent
Achievement
Level 4*
All Students 101 100 99 62 21 7 7
Male 101 55 54.5 67 18 7 4
Female 101 45 44.6 56 24 7 11
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native 101 1 1 -- -- -- --
Asian
Filipino
Hispanic or Latino 101 98 97 63 20 7 6
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
White 101 1 1 -- -- -- --
Two or More Races
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 101 99 98 62 21 7 7
English Learners 101 43 42.6 86 7 0 0
Students with Disabilities 101 13 12.9 77 15 0 0
Students Receiving Migrant Education Services
Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Note: Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.
Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores.
* Level 1 = Standard not met
   Level 2 = Standard nearly met
   Level 3 = Standard met
   Level 4 = Standard exceeded

Top of Page

CAASPP Assessment Results - English Language Arts (ELA)
Disaggregated by Student Groups, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven
(School Year 2014-15)

ELA - Grade 5
Student Groups Total
Enrollment
Number
Tested
Percent
Tested
Percent
Achievement
Level 1*
Percent
Achievement
Level 2*
Percent
Achievement
Level 3*
Percent
Achievement
Level 4*
All Students 115 113 98.3 58 27 12 1
Male 115 60 52.2 70 23 7 0
Female 115 53 46.1 43 30 19 2
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native 115 1 0.9 -- -- -- --
Asian
Filipino 115 1 0.9 -- -- -- --
Hispanic or Latino 115 110 95.7 57 26 13 1
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
White 115 1 0.9 -- -- -- --
Two or More Races
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 115 106 92.2 58 26 12 1
English Learners 115 44 38.3 82 14 0 0
Students with Disabilities 115 20 17.4 80 10 0 0
Students Receiving Migrant Education Services 115 1 0.9 -- -- -- --
Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Note: Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.
Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores.
* Level 1 = Standard not met
   Level 2 = Standard nearly met
   Level 3 = Standard met
   Level 4 = Standard exceeded

Top of Page

CAASPP Assessment Results - English Language Arts (ELA)
Disaggregated by Student Groups, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven
(School Year 2014-15)

ELA - Grade 6
Student Groups Total
Enrollment
Number
Tested
Percent
Tested
Percent
Achievement
Level 1*
Percent
Achievement
Level 2*
Percent
Achievement
Level 3*
Percent
Achievement
Level 4*
All Students 143 139 97.2 58 28 8 1
Male 143 76 53.1 64 26 3 1
Female 143 63 44.1 49 30 14 0
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian
Filipino
Hispanic or Latino 143 138 96.5 57 28 8 1
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
White
Two or More Races 143 0 0 -- -- -- --
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 143 134 93.7 58 28 8 1
English Learners 143 39 27.3 87 5 0 0
Students with Disabilities 143 14 9.8 93 0 7 0
Students Receiving Migrant Education Services
Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Note: Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.
Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores.
* Level 1 = Standard not met
   Level 2 = Standard nearly met
   Level 3 = Standard met
   Level 4 = Standard exceeded

Top of Page

CAASPP Assessment Results - English Language Arts (ELA)
Disaggregated by Student Groups, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven
(School Year 2014-15)

ELA - Grade 7
Student Groups Total
Enrollment
Number
Tested
Percent
Tested
Percent
Achievement
Level 1*
Percent
Achievement
Level 2*
Percent
Achievement
Level 3*
Percent
Achievement
Level 4*
All Students 147 140 95.2 48 33 16 1
Male 147 56 38.1 59 27 9 2
Female 147 84 57.1 40 37 20 0
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian
Filipino 147 2 1.4 -- -- -- --
Hispanic or Latino 147 133 90.5 49 32 15 1
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
White 147 1 0.7 -- -- -- --
Two or More Races 147 1 0.7 -- -- -- --
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 147 131 89.1 50 32 14 1
English Learners 147 17 11.6 88 12 0 0
Students with Disabilities 147 13 8.8 69 15 8 0
Students Receiving Migrant Education Services
Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Note: Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.
Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores.
* Level 1 = Standard not met
   Level 2 = Standard nearly met
   Level 3 = Standard met
   Level 4 = Standard exceeded

Top of Page

CAASPP Assessment Results - English Language Arts (ELA)
Disaggregated by Student Groups, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven
(School Year 2014-15)

ELA - Grade 8
Student Groups Total
Enrollment
Number
Tested
Percent
Tested
Percent
Achievement
Level 1*
Percent
Achievement
Level 2*
Percent
Achievement
Level 3*
Percent
Achievement
Level 4*
All Students 136 123 90.4 47 28 19 0
Male 136 57 41.9 49 26 19 0
Female 136 66 48.5 45 29 18 0
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian
Filipino
Hispanic or Latino 136 123 90.4 47 28 19 0
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
White
Two or More Races
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 136 115 84.6 47 29 17 0
English Learners 136 18 13.2 78 6 6 0
Students with Disabilities 136 10 7.4 -- -- -- --
Students Receiving Migrant Education Services 136 1 0.7 -- -- -- --
Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Note: Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.
Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores.
* Level 1 = Standard not met
   Level 2 = Standard nearly met
   Level 3 = Standard met
   Level 4 = Standard exceeded

Top of Page

CAASPP Assessment Results - English Language Arts (ELA)
Disaggregated by Student Groups, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven
(School Year 2014-15)

ELA - Grade 11
Student Groups Total
Enrollment
Number
Tested
Percent
Tested
Percent
Achievement
Level 1*
Percent
Achievement
Level 2*
Percent
Achievement
Level 3*
Percent
Achievement
Level 4*
All Students 176 163 92.6 8 23 45 14
Male 176 82 46.6 9 24 43 17
Female 176 81 46 7 22 48 11
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian
Filipino 176 1 0.6 -- -- -- --
Hispanic or Latino 176 160 90.9 8 24 44 14
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
White 176 2 1.1 -- -- -- --
Two or More Races
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 176 155 88.1 8 21 47 14
English Learners 176 9 5.1 -- -- -- --
Students with Disabilities 176 12 6.8 50 33 8 8
Students Receiving Migrant Education Services
Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Note: Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.
Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores.
* Level 1 = Standard not met
   Level 2 = Standard nearly met
   Level 3 = Standard met
   Level 4 = Standard exceeded

Top of Page

CAASPP Assessment Results - Mathematics
Disaggregated by Student Groups, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven
(School Year 2014-15)

Mathematics - Grade 3
Student Groups Total
Enrollment
Number
Tested
Percent
Tested
Percent
Achievement
Level 1*
Percent
Achievement
Level 2*
Percent
Achievement
Level 3*
Percent
Achievement
Level 4*
All Students 115 114 99.1 47 26 18 4
Male 115 49 42.6 45 18 29 6
Female 115 65 56.5 49 32 11 2
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native 115 1 0.9 -- -- -- --
Asian 115 1 0.9 -- -- -- --
Filipino
Hispanic or Latino 115 111 96.5 49 25 19 3
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
White
Two or More Races
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 115 109 94.8 48 28 18 3
English Learners 115 40 34.8 70 23 5 0
Students with Disabilities 115 9 7.8 -- -- -- --
Students Receiving Migrant Education Services 115 1 0.9 -- -- -- --
Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Note: Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.
Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores.
* Level 1 = Standard not met
   Level 2 = Standard nearly met
   Level 3 = Standard met
   Level 4 = Standard exceeded

Top of Page

CAASPP Assessment Results - Mathematics
Disaggregated by Student Groups, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven
(School Year 2014-15)

Mathematics - Grade 4
Student Groups Total
Enrollment
Number
Tested
Percent
Tested
Percent
Achievement
Level 1*
Percent
Achievement
Level 2*
Percent
Achievement
Level 3*
Percent
Achievement
Level 4*
All Students 101 98 97 52 31 13 1
Male 101 54 53.5 48 33 11 2
Female 101 44 43.6 57 27 16 0
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native 101 1 1 -- -- -- --
Asian
Filipino
Hispanic or Latino 101 96 95 53 30 14 1
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
White 101 1 1 -- -- -- --
Two or More Races
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 101 97 96 52 31 13 1
English Learners 101 42 41.6 76 24 0 0
Students with Disabilities 101 13 12.9 85 15 0 0
Students Receiving Migrant Education Services
Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Note: Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.
Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores.
* Level 1 = Standard not met
   Level 2 = Standard nearly met
   Level 3 = Standard met
   Level 4 = Standard exceeded

Top of Page

CAASPP Assessment Results - Mathematics
Disaggregated by Student Groups, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven
(School Year 2014-15)

Mathematics - Grade 5
Student Groups Total
Enrollment
Number
Tested
Percent
Tested
Percent
Achievement
Level 1*
Percent
Achievement
Level 2*
Percent
Achievement
Level 3*
Percent
Achievement
Level 4*
All Students 143 140 97.9 61 19 5 1
Male 143 77 53.8 64 16 4 1
Female 143 63 44.1 59 24 6 2
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian
Filipino
Hispanic or Latino 143 139 97.2 61 19 5 1
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
White
Two or More Races 143 0 0 -- -- -- --
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 143 135 94.4 61 19 5 1
English Learners 143 39 27.3 74 3 0 0
Students with Disabilities 143 15 10.5 60 0 7 0
Students Receiving Migrant Education Services
Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Note: Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.
Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores.
* Level 1 = Standard not met
   Level 2 = Standard nearly met
   Level 3 = Standard met
   Level 4 = Standard exceeded

Top of Page

CAASPP Assessment Results - Mathematics
Disaggregated by Student Groups, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven
(School Year 2014-15)

Mathematics - Grade 6
Student Groups Total
Enrollment
Number
Tested
Percent
Tested
Percent
Achievement
Level 1*
Percent
Achievement
Level 2*
Percent
Achievement
Level 3*
Percent
Achievement
Level 4*
All Students 143 140 97.9 61 19 5 1
Male 143 77 53.8 64 16 4 1
Female 143 63 44.1 59 24 6 2
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian
Filipino
Hispanic or Latino 143 139 97.2 61 19 5 1
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
White
Two or More Races 143 0 0 -- -- -- --
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 143 135 94.4 61 19 5 1
English Learners 143 39 27.3 74 3 0 0
Students with Disabilities 143 15 10.5 60 0 7 0
Students Receiving Migrant Education Services
Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Note: Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.
Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores.
* Level 1 = Standard not met
   Level 2 = Standard nearly met
   Level 3 = Standard met
   Level 4 = Standard exceeded

Top of Page

CAASPP Assessment Results - Mathematics
Disaggregated by Student Groups, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven
(School Year 2014-15)

Mathematics - Grade 7
Student Groups Total
Enrollment
Number
Tested
Percent
Tested
Percent
Achievement
Level 1*
Percent
Achievement
Level 2*
Percent
Achievement
Level 3*
Percent
Achievement
Level 4*
All Students 147 141 95.9 57 25 11 0
Male 147 58 39.5 55 28 9 0
Female 147 83 56.5 58 23 13 0
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian
Filipino 147 2 1.4 -- -- -- --
Hispanic or Latino 147 134 91.2 56 26 10 0
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
White 147 1 0.7 -- -- -- --
Two or More Races 147 1 0.7 -- -- -- --
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 147 133 90.5 58 24 11 0
English Learners 147 19 12.9 68 11 0 0
Students with Disabilities 147 14 9.5 71 7 0 0
Students Receiving Migrant Education Services
Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Note: Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.
Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores.
* Level 1 = Standard not met
   Level 2 = Standard nearly met
   Level 3 = Standard met
   Level 4 = Standard exceeded

Top of Page

CAASPP Assessment Results - Mathematics
Disaggregated by Student Groups, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven
(School Year 2014-15)

Mathematics - Grade 8
Student Groups Total
Enrollment
Number
Tested
Percent
Tested
Percent
Achievement
Level 1*
Percent
Achievement
Level 2*
Percent
Achievement
Level 3*
Percent
Achievement
Level 4*
All Students 147 141 95.9 57 25 11 0
Male 147 58 39.5 55 28 9 0
Female 147 83 56.5 58 23 13 0
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian
Filipino 147 2 1.4 -- -- -- --
Hispanic or Latino 147 134 91.2 56 26 10 0
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
White 147 1 0.7 -- -- -- --
Two or More Races 147 1 0.7 -- -- -- --
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 147 133 90.5 58 24 11 0
English Learners 147 19 12.9 68 11 0 0
Students with Disabilities 147 14 9.5 71 7 0 0
Students Receiving Migrant Education Services
Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Note: Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.
Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores.
* Level 1 = Standard not met
   Level 2 = Standard nearly met
   Level 3 = Standard met
   Level 4 = Standard exceeded

Top of Page

CAASPP Assessment Results - Mathematics
Disaggregated by Student Groups, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven
(School Year 2014-15)

Mathematics - Grade 11
Student Groups Total
Enrollment
Number
Tested
Percent
Tested
Percent
Achievement
Level 1*
Percent
Achievement
Level 2*
Percent
Achievement
Level 3*
Percent
Achievement
Level 4*
All Students 176 159 90.3 38 33 19 3
Male 176 82 46.6 35 30 24 5
Female 176 77 43.8 42 35 13 0
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian
Filipino 176 1 0.6 -- -- -- --
Hispanic or Latino 176 156 88.6 38 33 19 3
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
White 176 2 1.1 -- -- -- --
Two or More Races
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 176 151 85.8 36 34 19 3
English Learners 176 8 4.5 -- -- -- --
Students with Disabilities 176 12 6.8 67 0 8 8
Students Receiving Migrant Education Services
Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Note: Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.
Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores.
* Level 1 = Standard not met
   Level 2 = Standard nearly met
   Level 3 = Standard met
   Level 4 = Standard exceeded

Top of Page

California Standards Test for All Students in Science - Three-Year Comparison
Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards)
Subject School District State
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15
Science (Grades 5, 8, and 10) 42 48 32 50 50 46 59 60 56

Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.

Top of Page

California Standards Test Results by Student Group in Science
(School Year 2014-15)
Group Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced
All Students in the LEA 46
All Students at the School 32
Male 35
Female 29
Black or African American --
American Indian or Alaska Native --
Asian
Filipino --
Hispanic or Latino 32
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
White --
Two or More Races
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 32
English Learners 11
Students with Disabilities 18
Students Receiving Migrant Education Services --
Foster Youth --

Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.

Top of Page

Career Technical Education Programs (School Year 2014-15)

The Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 (Perkins IV) is a Federal act established to improve career-technical education programs, integrate academic and career-technical instruction, serve special populations, and meet gender equity needs. It led to the creation of academic and career technical education (CTE) coursework sequences that:

  • Incorporate and align secondary and postsecondary education elements
  • Include academic and CTE content in a coordinated, non-duplicative progression of courses
  • Offer the opportunity, where appropriate, for secondary students to acquire postsecondary credits
  • Lead to an industry-recognized credential or certificate at the postsecondary level, or an associate or baccalaureate degree.
  • Work-based learning opportunities include internships, job-shadowing, and work-based learning experiences.

The CTE program is delivered through programs of study using a comprehensive and structured approach to prepare students for postsecondary education and career success. Programs/classes that offer workplace preparation include:

  • CTE programs offered by the district that pupils at the school may participate in and that are aligned to the applicable model curriculum common core standards
  • CTE program sequences offered by the district
  • Select CTE courses that are approved for UC A-G credit

For additional information, contact the district CTE office (213-241-8754) or speak with the school principal.

In 2014-15, LAUSD funded 70 High Schools and over 200 pathways. Pathways include: Arts, Media and Entertainment, Energy, Environment and Utilities, Business and Finance, Engineering Design, Health Science and Medical Technology, Information and Communication Technology and other fields. Schools also have in place certification programs such as Microsoft Office Specialist (MOS), Adobe Certified Associate (ACA), A+ IT certification, Food Safety, OSHA, etc. The students from various schools also participated in Career Technical Student Organizations such as SkillsUSA, DECA, HOSA, FHA Hero, FFA to gain leadership and career readiness skills. They demonstrated their competencies by participating in regional, state and national competitions.

During the 2014-15 academic school year, the LAUSD made available 376 CTE courses that are aligned with the California High School Academic Content Standards, the California Career Technical Education Model Curriculum Standards, Multiple Pathways, and the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Initiative. The California Department of Education (CDE) certified the courses categorized according to the 15 Industry Sectors set by the California State Board of Education.

I. Agriculture and Natural Resources
  • A. Agricultural Business - 4 courses
  • B. Agricultural Mechanics - 3 courses
  • C. Agriscience - 8 courses
  • D. Animal Science - 5 courses
  • E. Forestry and Natural Resources - 3 courses
  • F. Ornamental Horticulture - 17 courses
  • G. Plant and Soil Science - 1 course
II. Arts, Media, and Entertainment
  • A. Design, Visual, and Media Arts - 17 courses
  • B. Performing Arts
  • C. Production and Managerial Arts - 19 courses
  • D. Game Design and Integration
III. Building and Construction Trades
  • A. Cabinetry, Millwork, and Woodworking - 8 courses
  • B. Engineering and Heavy Construction - 1 course
  • C. Mechanical Systems Installation and Repair
  • D. Residential and Commercial Construction - 4 courses
IV. Business and Finance
  • A. Business Management - 18 courses
  • B. Financial Services - 15 courses
  • C. International Business - 5 courses
V. Education, Child Development, and Family Services
  • A. Child Development - 14 courses
  • B. Consumer Services - 4 courses
  • C. Education - 4 courses
  • D. Family and Human Services - 3 courses
VI. Energy, Environment, and Utilities
  • A. Environmental Resources - 3 courses
  • B. Energy and Power Technology - 7 courses
  • C. Telecommunications - 11 courses
VII. Engineering and Architecture
  • A. Architectural Design - 13 courses
  • B. Engineering Technology - 1 course
  • C. Engineering Design - 8 courses
  • D. Environmental Engineering - 1 course
VIII. Fashion and Interior Design
  • A. Fashion Design and Merchandising - 11 courses
  • B. Personal Services - 11 courses
  • C. Interior Design - 1 course
IX. Health Science and Medical Technology
  • A. Biotechnology - 5 courses
  • B. Patient Care - 15 courses
  • C. Healthcare Administrative Services - 7 courses
  • D. Healthcare Operational Support Services - 2 courses
  • E. Public and Community Health - 3 courses
  • F. Mental and Behavioral Health
X. Hospitality, Tourism, and Recreation
  • A. Food Science, Dietetics, and Nutrition - 2 courses
  • B. Food Service and Hospitality - 11 courses
  • C. Hospitality, Tourism, and Recreation - 8 courses
XI. Information and Communication Technologies
  • A. Information Support and Services - 8 courses
  • B. Networking - 4 courses
  • C. Software and Systems Development - 13 courses
  • D. Games and Simulation - 1 course
XII. Manufacturing and Product Design
  • A. Graphic Production - 8 courses
  • B. Machining and Forming Technologies - 14 courses
  • C. Welding and Materials Joining
  • D. Product Innovation and Design - 3 courses
XIII. Marketing Sales and Service
  • A. Marketing
  • B. Professional Sales - 12 courses
  • C. Entrepreneurship / Self Employment - 4 courses
XIV. Public Services
  • A. Emergency Response
  • B. Legal Practices - 5 courses
  • C. Public Safety - 3 courses
XV. Transportation
  • A. Operations
  • B. Structural Repair and Refinishing - 6 courses
  • C. Systems Diagnostics and Service - 22 courses

Career Technical Education Participation (School Year 2014-15)
Measure CTE Program Participation
Number of Pupils Participating in CTE 459
Percent of Pupils Completing a CTE Program and Earning a High School Diploma 14.2
Percent of CTE Courses Sequenced or Articulated Between the School and Institutions of Postsecondary Education 71.4
Top of Page

Courses for University of California and/or California State University Admission
UC/CSU Course Measure Percent
2014-15 Students Enrolled in Courses Required for UC/CSU Admission 40.54
2013-14 Graduates Who Completed All Courses Required for UC/CSU Admission 59.49
Top of Page

State Priority: Other Pupil Outcomes

The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Other Pupil Outcomes State Priority (Priority 8):

California High School Exit Examination Results for All Grade Ten Students - Three-Year Comparison (if applicable)
Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced
Subject School District State
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15
English-Language Arts 48 47 31 49 47 49 57 56 58
Mathematics 55 58 34 54 56 53 60 62 59

Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.

Top of Page

California High School Exit Examination Grade Ten Results by Student Group
(School Year 2014-15) (if applicable)
Group English-Language Arts Mathematics
Percent Not Proficient Percent Proficient Percent Advanced Percent Not Proficient Percent Proficient Percent Advanced
All Students in the LEA 50 25 25 46 35 18
All Students at the School 69 18 13 66 29 5
Male 77 14 9 65 29 6
Female 61 23 16 67 30 3
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian
Filipino
Hispanic or Latino 69 18 13 66 29 5
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
White
Two or More Races
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 69 18 13 66 29 5
English Learners 100 100
Students with Disabilities 89 11 95 5
Students Receiving Migrant Education Services
Foster Youth

Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.

Top of Page

California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2014-15)
Level Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
Percent of Students Meeting Four of Six Fitness Standards 13.0 21.7 23.7
Percent of Students Meeting Five of Six Fitness Standards 22.2 8.4 21.9
Percent of Students Meeting Six of Six Fitness Standards 13.9 5.6 23.7

Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.

Top of Page

C.  Engagement

State Priority: Parental Involvement

The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Parental Involvement State Priority (Priority 3):

Opportunities for Parental Involvement - Most Recent Year

To participate with any of the following opportunities, contact the school principal.

School
Year
Advisory
Council
Governance
Council
PTA /
PTO
Classroom
Volunteer
Office
Volunteer
Supervision
Volunteer
Fund
Raising
School
Beautification
Other
2014-15 X X X X X X


State Priority: School Climate

The SARC provides the following information relevant to the School Climate State Priority (Priority 6):

Suspensions and Expulsions
Rate School District State
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15
Suspensions 1.11 0.73 1.07 1.72 1.30 0.91 5.07 4.36 3.80
Expulsions 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.13 0.10 0.09
Top of Page

School Safety Plan - Most Recent Year

Our school makes every effort to provide a safe, clean environment for learning. Classroom space is used to support our instructional program. Emergency drills are routinely held for earthquake and fire preparedness for our students and staff. As required by California Education Code (CEC), Section 35294, the school's Safe School Plan was revised and reviewed with staff on the following dates:

Safe School Plan Date Revised Date Reviewed with Staff
Volume 1 Prevention Programs     2015-10-01 2015-10-01
Volume 2 Emergency Procedures 2015-10-01 2015-10-01
Top of Page

D.  Other SARC Information

The information in this section is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorities for LCFF.

On August 6, 2013, the United States Secretary of Education awarded the NCLB Waiver to eight California school districts, including Los Angeles Unified School District, that are part of the California Office to Reform Education (CORE) Consortium. The waiver allows the CORE districts to immediately implement an alternative accountability system, instead of the AYP. This new accountability system, School Quality Improvement System, will give the participating districts more flexibility and accountability in how they measure student performance and raise academic performance at the district level. While the California Department of Education (CDE) continues to publish AYP status for LAUSD schools, beginning in 2013-14 school year, the district will implement the School Quality Improvement System.

The NCLB Waiver awarded to LAUSD allows for several flexibilities from the previous accountability system. While CDE continues to identify LAUSD and certain district schools to be in PI status, the corrective actions and other interventions previously required of PI district and schools are no longer mandatory as the district implements the School Quality Improvement System in 2014-15. Using the School Quality Improvement Index, the district will identify several categories of schools for improvement, including 'Priority', 'Focus', and 'Support'. The School Quality Improvement Index will also identify 'Reward' and 'Collaborative Partner' schools that have made progress, who may be required to partner with a Priority or Focus school to support improvement efforts.

Adequate Yearly Progress Overall and by Criteria (School Year 2014-15)
AYP Criteria School District State
Made AYP Overall No Yes Yes
Met Participation Rate - English-Language Arts Yes Yes Yes
Met Participation Rate - Mathematics No Yes Yes
Met Percent Proficient - English-Language Arts N/A N/A N/A
Met Percent Proficient - Mathematics N/A N/A N/A
Met Attendance Rate Yes Yes Yes
Met Graduation Rate Yes Yes Yes
Top of Page

Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2015-16)
Indicator School District
Program Improvement Status In PI In PI
First Year of Program Improvement 2004-2005 2004-2005
Year in Program Improvement* Year 5 Year 3
Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement N/A 652
Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement N/A 71.3

Note: Cells with NA values do not require data.

Top of Page

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary)
Grade
Level
Avg.
Class
Size
2012-13
Number of Classes*
Avg.
Class
Size
2013-14
Number of Classes*
Avg.
Class
Size
2014-15
Number of Classes*
1-20 21-32 33+ 1-20 21-32 33+ 1-20 21-32 33+
K 23 1 4 17 6 19 2 4
1 21 1 4 23 5 25 3
2 18 5 21 1 4 24 5
3 19 5 19 3 2 21 1 5
4 32 3 1 25 4 27 3
5 26 4 28 1 4 27 1 4
6 32 11 5 31 12 5 30 1 12 4
Other 14 2 3 1

* Number of classes indicates how many classes fall into each size category (a range of total students per class)

Top of Page

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary)
Material Avg.
Class
Size
2012-13
Number of Classes*
Avg.
Class
Size
2013-14
Number of Classes*
Avg.
Class
Size
2014-15
Number of Classes*
1-22 23-32 33+ 1-22 23-32 33+ 1-22 23-32 33+
English 22 19 15 14 22 23 20 12 23 23 19 11
Mathematics 24 12 14 10 25 10 19 11 25 15 13 14
Science 24 12 12 12 24 13 12 12 25 10 15 10
Social Science 25 10 15 12 27 6 14 13 26 9 13 10

* Number of classes indicates how many classrooms fall into each size category (a range of total students per classroom). At the secondary school level, this information is reported by subject area rather than grade level.

Top of Page

Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff (School Year 2014-15)
Title Number of FTE* Assigned to School Average Number of Students per
Academic Counselor
Academic Counselor 5.20 347
Counselor (Social/Behavioral or Career Development) 0.00 N/A
Library Media Teacher (librarian) 1.00 N/A
Library Media Services Staff (paraprofessional) n/a N/A
Psychologist 0.74 N/A
Social Worker 0.50 N/A
Nurse 0.40 N/A
Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist 0.00 N/A
Resource Specialist (non-teaching) 0.00 N/A
Other 0.00 N/A

Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data.
* One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time.

Top of Page

Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2013-14)
Level Expenditures Per Pupil Average
Teacher Salary
Total
Expenditures
Supplemental /
Restricted
Basic /
Unrestricted
School Site $8,345 $3,182 $5,163 $70,166
District N/A N/A $5,729 $68,881
Percent Difference - School Site and District N/A N/A -10% 2%
State N/A N/A $5,348 $72,971
Percent Difference - School Site and State N/A N/A -3% -4%

Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data.

Top of Page

Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2014-15)

This section provides information about the programs and supplemental services that are available at the school and funded through categorical sources.

Title I funds are used to support effective, research-based educational strategies for students not meeting the state's challenging academic achievement standards. Title I funds are distributed to schools with a minimum of 50% poverty on a per-pupil basis. Based on an analysis of student achievement data, Title I resources may be used for professional development, TIER II supplemental instruction and intervention, parental involvement, personalization and support for students with at-risk behaviors.

Title III funds assist English Learners (EL) in acquiring English fluency, gaining access to the curriculum, and achieving grade-level and graduation standards. Funds are distributed to school sites based on the number of EL students enrolled.

Economic Impact Aid-Limited English Proficient (EIA-LEP) is a state categorical program that provides supplemental funds to support programs for English Learners. Use of supplemental EIA funds for English Learners at the school level is administered through the Single School Plan as approved by the School Site Council and the local governing board. Typical examples include funds set aside for professional development, the purchase of supplemental materials and expenses that support paraprofessionals, supplemental resource teachers, and the operation of EL advisory committees.

School Year Title I Title III EIA-LEP
2014-15 X X X


Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2014-15)
Category District Amount State Average For Districts
In Same Category
Beginning Teacher Salary $39,788 $43,165
Mid-Range Teacher Salary $63,553 $68,574
Highest Teacher Salary $78,906 $89,146
Average Principal Salary (Elementary) $105,723 $111,129
Average Principal Salary (Middle) $115,222 $116,569
Average Principal Salary (High) $116,595 $127,448
Superintendent Salary $350,000 $234,382
Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries 35 38
Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries 5 5

Note: For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/.

Top of Page

Advanced Placement Courses (School Year 2014-15)
Subject Number of
AP Courses Offered*
Percent of Students
In AP Courses
Computer Science N/A
English 2 N/A
Fine and Performing Arts N/A
Foreign Language 4 N/A
Mathematics 1 N/A
Science 2 N/A
Social Science 2 N/A
All courses 11 0.5

Note: AP means Advanced Placement.
Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data.
* Where there are student course enrollments.

Top of Page

Professional Development - Most Recent Three Years

Professional Development

The professional development provided in the 2014-2015 school year was designed to deepen the knowledge of teachers and schools leaders on the implementation of the California Content Standards (aka CCSS) in English/Language Arts, mathematics, science, and literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects and other content subjects. The professional development has built upon the phases of implementation of the standards, the Professional Learning and Leadership Development initiatives incorporating the Teaching and Learning and School Leadership frameworks, and targeted instruction for our subgroups. The primary focus of professional development within the District continues to be focused on effective first instruction using the California Content Standards as the foundation for multi-tiered systems of support for both tier I instruction and tier II/III interventions for behavior and academics. The District encourages schools to use a Plan-Deliver-Reflect-Revise model where teachers work collaboratively to construct instructional lessons, analyze student work, and reflect on instructional practices. The specific focus areas have been on the delivery of literacy and language instruction that ensures that all students read, write, speak and listen effectively, accurately, and fluently by the end of 2nd grade; the implementation of the California English Language Development Standards (CA ELD); the transition to the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS); and the development of the instructional leadership team to collectively build capacity that increases the ability of all educators to make the instructional changes needed for all students to be college- and career-ready.

Time Contractually Allotted for Professional Development for Teachers*

Elementary Schools
Academic Year Banked Time (Hours) Pupil Free (Hours)
2014-15 26 Hours 6 Hours
2013-14 26 Hours 6 Hours
2012-13 26 Hours 6 Hours

Secondary Schools
Academic Year Banked Time (Hours) Pupil Free (Hours)
2014-15 21 Hours 6 Hours
2013-14 14 Hours 6 Hours
2012-13 14 Hours 6 Hours

Note: * Schools often provided additional professional development time based on specific school-site scheduling and budgetary decisions.

Top of Page