School Accountability Report Card
State Reporting Services Branch



Los Angeles Unified School District   >   Office of Data and Accountability   >   SRSB   >   School Accountability Report Card

SARC
Select language

School Accountability Report Card
Reported Using Data from the 2019-2020 School Year
California Department of Education

(Published During 2020-2021)

Joseph Le Conte Middle

By February 1 of each year, every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC). The SARC contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educational agencies (LEAs) are required to prepare a Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, with specific activities to address state and local priorities. Additionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent with data reported in the SARC.

DataQuest is an online data tool located on the CDE DataQuest web page at https://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/ that contains additional information about this school and comparisons of the school to the district and the county. Specifically, DataQuest is a dynamic system that provides reports for accountability (e.g., test data, enrollment, high school graduates, dropouts, course enrollments, staffing, and data regarding English learners.)

California School Dashboard The California School Dashboard (Dashboard) https://www.caschooldashboard.org/ reflects California's new accountability and continuous improvement system and provides information about how LEAs and schools are meeting the needs of California's diverse student population. The Dashboard contains reports that display the performance of LEAs, schools, and student groups on a set of state and local measures to assist in identifying strengths, challenges, and areas in need of improvement.


About This School

District Contact Information (School Year 2020-21)
Entity Contact Information
District Name Los Angeles Unified School District
Phone Number 213-241-1000
Superintendent Austin Beutner
Email Address superintendent@lausd.net
Website achieve.lausd.net
Top of Page

School Contact Information (School Year 2020-21)
Entity Contact Information
School Name Joseph Le Conte Middle
Joseph Le Conte Middle School (Le Conte MS) 
Street 1316 N BRONSON AVE 
City, State, Zip HOLLYWOOD, CA 90028 
Phone Number 323-308-1700 
Principal DURAN, EDUARDO 
Email Address exd8386@lausd.net 
Website lecontems.net 
County-District-School (CDS) Code 19 64733 6061501 
Top of Page

School Description and Mission Statement (School Year 2020-21)

All youth achieving is the overall mission of Los Angeles Unified School District. The District's vision is that every LAUSD student will complete high school college-prepared and career-ready. To achieve our mission and vision, all schools in the District are committed to meeting the five goals listed below:

  1. 100% Graduation
  2. Academic Proficiency for All Students
  3. 100% Attendance
  4. Student, Parent, and Community Engagement
  5. School Safety

This School Accountability Report Card shows how well our school and students are meeting the District's goals.


Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2019-20)
Grade Level Number of Students
Kindergarten
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6 143 
Grade 7 326 
Grade 8 275 
Ungraded Elementary
Grade 9
Grade 10
Grade 11
Grade 12
Ungraded Secondary
Total Enrollment 744 
Top of Page

Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2019-20)
Group Percent of Total Enrollment
Black or African American 3.9 
American Indian or Alaska Native  
Asian 2.8 
Filipino 1.7 
Hispanic or Latino 82 
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0.4 
White 8.7 
Two or More Races 0.3 
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 95.3 
English Learners 20.7 
Students with Disabilities 13.4 
Foster Youth  
Homeless 2.2 
Top of Page

A.  Conditions of Learning

State Priority: Basic

The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Basic State Priority (Priority 1):


Teacher Credentials
Teachers School District
2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2020-21
With Full Credential 45  35  33  20,610 
Without Full Credential 669 
Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence (with full credential) 1,337 
Top of Page

Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions
Indicator 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners
Total Teacher Misassignments*
Vacant Teacher Positions

Note: "Misassignments" refers to the number of positions filled by teachers who lack legal authorization to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc.

* Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners.

Top of Page

Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Other Instructional Materials
(School Year 2020-21)

(Month and year in which data were collected: November 2019 )
Subject Textbooks and Other Instructional
Materials / Year of Adoption
From Most Recent Adoption? Percent Students Lacking
Own Assigned Copy
Reading / Language Arts 2016  Yes 
Mathematics 2014  Yes 
Science 2020  Yes 
History-Social Science 2019  Yes 
Foreign Language N/A  N/A  N/A 
Health 2005  Yes 
Visual and Performing Arts 2008  Yes  100 
Science Laboratory Equipment (Grades 9-12) N/A N/A N/A 

Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data.

Top of Page

School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements

The District takes great efforts to ensure that all schools are clean, safe, and functional within the available resources. The District has established cleaning standards for all school facilities in assigning and inspecting custodial work. Food service and restroom facilities are given highest priority on a daily basis to ensure the health and safety of students and staff. Other cleaning functions may be scheduled on a less than daily frequency due to the limitation of available custodial resources. Determination of repair status is based on the most recent SARC Inspection. Additional information about the condition of the school facilities may be obtained from the school.

School Facility Good Repair Status

(Month and year of most recent FIT report: June 2020 )
System Inspected Repair Status Repair Needed and Action Taken or Planned
Gas Leaks GOOD   
Mechanical / HVAC GOOD   
Sewer GOOD   
Interior Surfaces GOOD   
Overall Cleanliness GOOD   
Pest / Vermin Infestation GOOD   
Electrical (Interior and Exterior) GOOD   
Restrooms GOOD   
Sinks / Drinking Fountains (Inside and Outside) GOOD   
Fire Safety GOOD   
Hazardous Materials (Interior and Exterior) GOOD   
Structural Damage GOOD   
Roofs GOOD   
Playground / School Grounds GOOD   
Windows / Doors / Gates / Fences GOOD   
Overall Rating EXEMPLARY   

Note: Not all of the cited maintenance deficiencies in this category have been repaired or mitigated to date, but have been reported via a Service Call and will be completed based on the priority, age and our resource availabilities.

Top of Page

B. Pupil Outcomes

State Priority: Pupil Achievement

The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Pupil Achievement State Priority (Priority 4):


CAASPP Test Results in ELA and Mathematics for All Students
Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven
Percentage of Students Meeting or Exceeding the State Standards
Subject School District State
2018-19 2019-20 2018-19 2019-20 2018-19 2019-20
English Language Arts / Literacy (Grades 3-8 and 11) 31    45    50   
Mathematics (Grades 3-8 and 11) 18    34    39   

Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data.

Note: The 2019-2020 data are not available. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Executive Order N-30-20 was issued which waived the requirement for statewide testing for the 2019-2020 school year.

Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.

Note: ELA and mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The "Percent Met or Exceeded" is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard (i.e., achieved Level 3-Alternate) on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments.

Top of Page

CAASPP Test Results in Science for All Students
Grades Five, Eight, and High School
Percentage of Students Meeting or Exceeding the State Standard
Subject School District State
2018-19 2019-20 2018-19 2019-20 2018-19 2019-20
Science (Grades 5, 8, and High School) 19  N/A   N/A   N/A

Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data.

Note: The 2019-2020 data are not available. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Executive Order N-30-20 was issued which waived the requirement for statewide testing for the 2019-2020 school year.

Note: The new California Science Test (CAST) was first administered operationally in the 2018-19 school year.

Top of Page

State Priority: Other Pupil Outcomes

The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Other Pupil Outcomes State Priority (Priority 8):


California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2019-20)
Level Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
Percentage of Students Meeting Four of Six Fitness Standards      
Percentage of Students Meeting Five of Six Fitness Standards      
Percentage of Students Meeting Six of Six Fitness Standards      

Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data.

Note: The 2019-2020 data are not available. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Executive Order N-56-20 was issued which waived the requirement for statewide testing for the 2019-2020 school year.

Top of Page

C.  Engagement

State Priority: Parental Involvement

The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Parental Involvement State Priority (Priority 3):


Opportunities for Parental Involvement (School Year 2020-21)

To participate with any of the following opportunities, contact the school principal.

School
Year
Advisory
Council
Governance
Council
PTA /
PTO
Classroom
Volunteer
Office
Volunteer
Supervision
Volunteer
Fund
Raising
School
Beautification
Other
2020-21        
Top of Page

State Priority: School Climate

The SARC provides the following information relevant to the School Climate State Priority (Priority 6):


Suspensions and Expulsions
(Data collected between July through June,
each full school year respectively)
Rate School District State
2017-18 2018-19 2017-18 2018-19 2017-18 2018-19
Suspensions 0.81  0.39  0.93  0.76  3.65  3.65 
Expulsions 0.02  0.02  0.09  0.09 

Suspensions and Expulsions for School Year 2019-2020 Only
(Data collected between July through February, partial school year due to the COVID-19 pandemic)
Rate School District State
2019-20 2019-20 2019-20
Suspensions 2.26  0.79  3.51 
Expulsions 0.02  0.08 

Note: The 2019-2020 suspensions and expulsions rate data are not comparable to prior year data because the 2019-2020 school year is a partial school year due to the COVID-19 crisis. As such, it would be inappropriate to make any comparisons in rates of suspensions and expulsions in the 2019-2020 school year compared to prior years.

Top of Page

School Safety Plan (School Year 2020-21)

Our school makes every effort to provide a safe, clean environment for learning. Classroom space is used to support our instructional program. Emergency drills are routinely held for earthquake and fire preparedness for our students and staff. As required by California Education Code (CEC), Section 35294, the school's Safe School Plan was revised and reviewed with staff on the following dates:

Safe School Plan Date Revised Date Reviewed with Staff
Volume 1 Prevention Programs     2020-11-02  2020-11-02 
Top of Page

D.  Other SARC Information

The information in this section is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorities for LCFF.

On August 6, 2013, the United States Secretary of Education awarded the NCLB Waiver to eight California school districts, including Los Angeles Unified School District, that are part of the California Office to Reform Education (CORE) Consortium. The waiver allows the CORE districts to immediately implement an alternative accountability system, instead of the AYP. This new accountability system, School Quality Improvement System, will give the participating districts more flexibility and accountability in how they measure student performance and raise academic performance at the district level. While the California Department of Education (CDE) continues to publish AYP status for LAUSD schools, beginning in 2013-14 school year, the district will implement the School Quality Improvement System.

The NCLB Waiver awarded to LAUSD allows for several flexibilities from the previous accountability system. While CDE continues to identify LAUSD and certain district schools to be in PI status, the corrective actions and other interventions previously required of PI district and schools are no longer mandatory as the district implements the School Quality Improvement System in 2014-15. Using the School Quality Improvement Index, the district will identify several categories of schools for improvement, including 'Priority', 'Focus', and 'Support'. The School Quality Improvement Index will also identify 'Reward' and 'Collaborative Partner' schools that have made progress, who may be required to partner with a Priority or Focus school to support improvement efforts.


Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary)
(School Year 2017-18)
Grade
Level
Avg.
Class
Size
Number of Classes*
1-20 21-32 33+
K        
1        
2        
3        
4        
5        
6 27  19 
Other**        

* Number of classes indicates how many classes fall into each size category (a range of total students per class).
** "Other" category is for multi-grade level classes.

Top of Page

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary)
(School Year 2018-19)
Grade
Level
Avg.
Class
Size
Number of Classes*
1-20 21-32 33+
K        
1        
2        
3        
4        
5        
6 25  20 
Other        

* Number of classes indicates how many classes fall into each size category (a range of total students per class).
** "Other" category is for multi-grade level classes.

Top of Page

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary)
(School Year 2019-20)
Grade
Level
Avg.
Class
Size
Number of Classes*
1-20 21-32 33+
K        
1        
2        
3        
4        
5        
6 13  44  17 
Other        

* Number of classes indicates how many classes fall into each size category (a range of total students per class).
** "Other" category is for multi-grade level classes.

Top of Page

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary)
(School Year 2017-18)
Subject Avg.
Class
Size
Number of Classes*
1-22 23-32 33+
English Language Arts 18  27  16 
Mathematics 24  16 
Science 23  11   
Social Science 24  10  18 

* Number of classes indicates how many classrooms fall into each size category (a range of total students per classroom). At the secondary school level, this information is reported by subject area rather than grade level.

Top of Page

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary)
(School Year 2018-19)
Subject Avg.
Class
Size
Number of Classes*
1-22 23-32 33+
English Language Arts 18  25  17 
Mathematics 21  13  15 
Science 23 
Social Science 25  16 

* Number of classes indicates how many classrooms fall into each size category (a range of total students per classroom). At the secondary school level, this information is reported by subject area rather than grade level.

Top of Page

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary)
(School Year 2019-20)
Subject Avg.
Class
Size
Number of Classes*
1-22 23-32 33+
English Language Arts 21  20  13 
Mathematics 22  11  17   
Science 23 
Social Science 26  14 

* Number of classes indicates how many classrooms fall into each size category (a range of total students per classroom). At the secondary school level, this information is reported by subject area rather than grade level.

Top of Page

Ratio of Pupils to Academic Counselor (School Year 2019-20)
Title Ratio
Pupils to Academic Counselor* 372 

* One full time equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time.

Top of Page

Student Support Services Staff (School Year 2019-20)
Title Number of FTE* Assigned to School
Counselor (Academic, Social/Behavioral or Career Development)  
Library Media Teacher (Librarian)
Library Media Services Staff (Paraprofessional)  
Psychologist  
Social Worker  
Nurse  
Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist  
Resource Specialist (non-teaching)  
Other

* One full time equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time.

Top of Page

Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2018-19)
Level Expenditures Per Pupil Average
Teacher Salary
Total
Expenditures
Restricted Unrestricted
School Site $13,801  $3,791  $10,010  $77,346 
District N/A N/A $9,055  $78,962 
Percent Difference - School Site and District N/A N/A 11%  -2% 
State N/A N/A $7,750  $83,052 
Percent Difference - School Site and State N/A N/A 29%  -7% 

Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data.

Top of Page

Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2019-20)

This section provides information about the programs and supplemental services that are available at the school and funded through categorical sources.

Title I funds are used to support effective, evidence based educational strategies for students not meeting the state's challenging academic achievement standards. Title I funds are distributed to schools with a minimum of 50% poverty on a per-pupil basis. Based on an analysis of student achievement data, Title I resources may be used for professional development, supplemental instruction and intervention, parental involvement, personalization and support for students who are academically at risk.

Title III funds are allocated to supplement the core language instruction educational programs to ensure English Learner (EL) students, including immigrant children and youth, achieve English proficiency and meet the same challenging state academic standards that other students are expected to meet. These support services must be based on evidence that demonstrates program effectiveness and may include effective professional development to teachers, principals, administrators, and other school or community-based organizational personnel. Professional development activities funded with Title III funds must be of sufficient intensity and duration to have a positive and lasting impact on teacher capacity to meet the instructional needs of English learners. Each local district determines how funds are distributed to school sites based on locally determined needs. Funds may be used to provide EL instructional coaches and professional development services.

School Year Title I Title III
2019-20 
Top of Page

Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2019-20)
Category District Amount State Average For Districts
In Same Category
Beginning Teacher Salary $46,587  $50,029 
Mid-Range Teacher Salary $74,412  $77,680 
Highest Teacher Salary $92,389  $102,143 
Average Principal Salary (Elementary) $117,849  $128,526 
Average Principal Salary (Middle) $131,307  $133,574 
Average Principal Salary (High) $135,702  $147,006 
Superintendent Salary $350,000  $284,736 
Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries 29  33 
Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries

Note: For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs.

Top of Page

Professional Development - Most Recent 3 Years

The 2020-21 school year professional development was designed to deepen the knowledge of teachers and school leaders of priority Districtwide initiatives as identified through data analysis and input from schools. These initiatives focused on improving instruction and services to specific student groups through a multi-tiered system of supports. Some specific student groups identified through data include English Learners, Standard English Learners, and foster youth.

Districtwide professional development included:

  • Fall Continuity of Learning (10 hours) for 32,000 certificated employees to support Distance/online learning for all students
  • Future Ready training (30 hours) for 13,000 certificated staff to deepen content, technology, and pedagogical knowledge during Distance Learning
  • Spring Professional development (3 hours) for 32,000 certificated employees to support Distance/online learning for all students
  • Focus on standards-based instruction
  • Focus on improving distance learning through student engagement strategies
  • Ongoing implementation of the 2018 English Learner/Standard English Learner Master Plan that outlines supports for these student groups
  • The District's next steps in implementing dual language programs as well as the state English Language Development standards
  • Training focused on increasing the capacity of school-site personnel to identify and support foster youth in order to improve the success of these students including meeting the requirements for AB329 to ensure that foster care youth are guaranteed to receive sexual health and HIV prevention education
  • Administrators and educators at all levels were offered face-to-face and virtual training sessions to learn about the learning management system and online gradebook
  • The Academic English Mastery Program (AEMP) has provided districtwide professional develop to teachers, administrators and families around Culturally and Linguistically Responsive practices. Professional development ssessions were held during fall/winter/spring institutes across local districts
  • School Safety
  • The Access, Equity and Acceleration Unit has facilitated professional development for stakeholders at each local district and provided online professional development modules through MyPLN. Trainings are aimed at providing an overview of the MTSS framework and to support implementation at school sites
  • Training for all school site personnel on the characteristics of dyslexia, how to identify systems to support students with dyslexia, and an exploration of dyslexia resources available in L.A. Unified

In addition, professional development that focused on the California content standards and frameworks in English language arts, English language development, mathematics, history/social studies, science, visual performing arts, health, physical education, other content subjects and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. The professional development has built upon the phases of implementation of the standards, the Professional Learning and Leadership Development initiatives incorporating the Teaching and Learning and School Leadership frameworks, and targeted instruction for student groups.

The primary focus of professional development within the District continues to be focused on effective first instruction. and tiered support for all students. Specific focus areas have been on the delivery of literacy and language instruction that ensures that all students read, write, speak and listen effectively, accurately, and fluently by the end of second grade; the implementation of the California English language development standards; the transition to the new state History/Social Science and Science Frameworks; and the development of the instructional leadership team to collectively build capacity that increases the ability of all educators to make the instructional changes needed for all students to be college-prepared and career-ready.

Time Contractually Allotted for Professional Development for Teachers*

Elementary Schools
Measure (Days) 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
Number of school days dedicated to Staff Development and Continuous Improvement 28* 28* 28**

Secondary Schools
Measure (Days) 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
Number of school days dedicated to Staff Development and Continuous Improvement 16* 16* 16**

* These are partial days.

** There was no banked time during the 2020-2021 school year due to alternate schedules due to COVID-19. Schools often provided additional professional development time based on specific school-site scheduling and budgetary decisions.


Elementary Schools
Academic Year Banked Time (Hours) Pupil Free (Hours)
2020-21 37.5* 37.5*
2019-20 26 6
2018-19 26 6

Secondary Schools
Academic Year Banked Time (Hours) Pupil Free (Hours)
2020-21 37.5* 37.5*
2019-20 21 6
2018-19 21 6

Note: * There was no banked time during the 2020-2021 school year due to alternate schedules due to COVID-19. Schools often provided additional professional development time based on specific school-site scheduling and budgetary decisions.

Top of Page